Nature vs nurture: -
Nature versus nurture is the terminology and concept of psychology and social psychology used to develop individuals' innate innate qualities (nature or nature) and behavior developed by the environment and environment influences found during their upbringing and upbringing. The mutual complementarity and symptoms of symptoms are discussed. Literally as a vocabulary, it is a Hindi translation of the English idiom Nature versus nurture and this English sentence has been prevalent in England for a long time. Which itself
nature vs Nurture
Nature and psychology are two terms used in behavioral psychology that can identify a range of differences between them. Nature refers to these characteristics which are innate. A person is born with specific skills and characteristics. Nature throws light on this aspect. Nutrition, on the other hand, highlights that the concept of innate, hereditary characteristics are false. According to this belief, human behavior is not innate, but is practiced. This is the main difference between nature and nutrition. In behaviorism, one of the main behaviors is the conflict between nature and nurture when it comes to human behavior. Behaviorists believe that nothing is comfortable, and everything comes through dialogue. This highlights that psychology versus nature has been a controversial topic of discussion. Through this article let us examine the concepts that can be found through the understanding of two concepts between nature and nutrition.
What is nature?
The concept of nature is applied in behavioral psychology in terms of certain genetic and hereditary characteristics that are passed from one generation to another. Nature determines the characteristics and characteristics that you can inherit from the fact that some of your ancestors and ancestors are endowed with similar characteristics and characteristics. For example, if your grandfather and great-grandfather were artists, then you are more likely to develop into a good artist. This is due to the fact that you acquire the qualities or characteristics of your ancestors and ancestors in matters related to art and facial features. However, psychologists believe that more than inherited characteristics, learned attributes are important and that human behavior can be changed through learning. J. Watson once said 'Give me a dozen healthy babies, well formed and to bring them into my special world and I will randomly pick one and train it to guarantee that I choose any specialist I can - a doctor, a lawyer, an artist '. This exposes the belief that pragmatists were nurtured in opposition to the role of nature. Now we focus on nutrition.
What is nutrition?
The concept of nutrition does not include the element of hereditary traits. It completely depends on the elements of practice, context and care. For that matter an author would be in a position to create a masterpiece after taking much training in the art of writing, referring to books and practicing the art of composition. He would have become a writer, even if his ancestors were not writers. This is the basic difference between the concepts of nature and nutrition. John Locke once said that when we are born, our mind is a r 'tabla rasa' or a blank slate. It is through learning that we acquire certain skills, behaviorism and practices. When it comes to nutrition, the contribution made by psychologists to behaviorist psychology cannot be ignored. To prove the effect of nutrition on training and changing behavior, in particular, the classical conditioning of B. F. Skinner's Pavlov and operative conditioning has to be highlighted. Through his experiment, Pavlov stated that involuntary emotional and physical responses can be conditioned through learning. In addition, Skinner pointed out that behavior can be changed through reinforcement and punishment. These theories emphasize that behavior is not always inherent, but can also be learned. Now we move on to the difference between the two concepts.
What is the difference between nature and nutrition?
Nature depends on inherited skills while nutrition depends on better skills.
Nature relies on genetics while nutrition depends on time spent acquiring skills.
Nutrition has nothing to do with heredity and ancestry whereas nature has everything to do with heredity and descent. Similarly, nature has nothing to do with spending time while the concept of nutrition has everything to do with spending time.
कोई टिप्पणी नहीं:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें